breakthrough summit

I don’t know if I’d say the theme of last week’s iMedia Breakthrough Summit was mobile, but there has definitely been movement in the marketplace since this time, last year. There’s no secret in our industry that the mobile web has unlimited potential. Mobile is likely the most important of the emerging platforms. John Hadl, Managing Partner & Founder of BrandinHand, Inc. has been quoted as saying, “We are at the tipping point in terms of consumer adoption and the starting gate in term of marketers’ readiness to embrace the medium. 2008 is the year of rising tides … a rising tide lifts all ships.” By 2011, the mobile advertising market is estimated to be worth over $11.5 billion annually. While there were more noteworthy case studies at this year’s conference, mobile has yet to find a fixed spot in the marketing mix budget.  After talking with some of my peers, it seems like the biggest hurdle for mobile is that it is directly competing with online budgets. Should it be? Does it take the place of traditional or online media?

During one of the keynotes, Jeffrey Cole (above), director of the USC Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future (that’s a mouthful); believes that, “No medium will disappear.” I agree, each medium has its own unique value proposition. As marketers, we determine how to prioritize the value and experience each delivers to the end-consumer. As the audience matures and the technology becomes more sophisticated, we’re seeing more brands leverage mobile platforms. For those of us in the industry, it feels like adoption is slow, but it’s still too complex for many advertisers to embrace. There are multiple carriers in the U.S. that won’t let us segment their audiences, technologies like GSM and CDMA, mobile ad networks, WAP applications, on-deck vs. off deck, etc…

We can wait for someone else to figure it out (which I’m not willing to do) – or we can stop treating it like the platforms of the past.  Mobile marketing has a unique offering around the consumer experience.  We need to focus on the brand problems we’re trying solve, thinking of mobile as a utility to solve those problems versus a technology.  Leverage the mobile device for what it is best used for: engagement through function and entertainment to add value and delight. 

While I don’t think that mobile is going to be a consistent marketing initiative for most brands this year (as much as I wish it would for some), there are a substantial amount of respectable branded case studies showcased at the event – I’ve included links to some, if they are live or if there is a site that offers more information:

  • http://blog.zelfi.com/en Julia

    No new medium will replace an old one – that’s a law in communication studies. The old medium has to find itself a niche. There’s still radio, and it’s popular. And Mobile Internet satisfies other needs than the “stationary” internet. It’s more about quick info, quick entertainment and so on. No normal human being will do a 3-hours-research with their mobile phone.
    If 2008 is the year of mobile? I’d say “no”. What a small percentage of geeks and managers do and use is not what the majority of people do (what a “breakthrough really means). And the majority will just keep on messaging, calling and taking snapshots. Maybe I’m wrong, but it’s already April…

  • Heidi Skinner

    Julia – I totally agree. However, we can get closer to a better mobile consumer experience by providing more usable content and less re-purposed or translated web, TV, radio, print content. Design and technology are key players in delivery. We need to embrace the user behaviors you mention above and make them better. When integrated correctly, they are not only useful, but leave the consumer feeling satisfied without calling attention to the techniques (in this case mobile technologies) that are used. Yep. You are right… Mobile hasn’t earned a seat at the table yet, what are your thoughts about 2009?

  • Heidi Skinner

    An AdAge Article was released today, suggesting that this (again) isn’t the year for mobile. We’ve talked about most of the reasons they list as barriers (above) with the exception of “Reach” which was listed as the #1 sticking point in the article (http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=125977).

    In most cases at Critical Mass, we’ve successfully reached many consumers and prospects via mobile. While, it’s not to “critical mass” (pardon the pun) – it has hit scale.

    Even with that disagreement the article is a worthwhile read.

blog comments powered by Disqus