<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I (heart) Google Chrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://experiencematters.criticalmass.com/2008/09/02/i-heart-google-chrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://experiencematters.criticalmass.com/2008/09/02/i-heart-google-chrome/</link>
	<description>Great customer experiences and what it takes to pull them off</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:16:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SuezanneC Baskerville</title>
		<link>http://experiencematters.criticalmass.com/2008/09/02/i-heart-google-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-4068</link>
		<dc:creator>SuezanneC Baskerville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experiencematters.criticalmass.com/?p=339#comment-4068</guid>
		<description>I just installed Chrome 2, and it puts shadows in the wrong places on the Second Life forum site, which is a fairly blandly themed  vBulletin  forum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just installed Chrome 2, and it puts shadows in the wrong places on the Second Life forum site, which is a fairly blandly themed  vBulletin  forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hahen</title>
		<link>http://experiencematters.criticalmass.com/2008/09/02/i-heart-google-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-1782</link>
		<dc:creator>Hahen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experiencematters.criticalmass.com/?p=339#comment-1782</guid>
		<description>Chrome has been amazing so far, I love everything about it, and yes some issues still exist.

IT&#039;S STILL IN BETA FOR GOD SAKES....


I&#039;ve praised Google for a very long time now and their company just keeps pushing forward. I was however, reluctant to go Chrome, because I do love Firefox so very much.It&#039;s been good to me where IE5-7 have just made me disgusted, IE needs to wake up and crawl out of the middle ages of the internet already, because what it&#039;s done so far has just made me tuck tail and run. I&#039;ve looked at the beta for IE8 and it looks nice and all, but I&#039;d stick with FF2 if three hadn&#039;t come out already.


Back to Google Chrome, the fact that there aren&#039;t add ons or Skins for chrome so far isn&#039;t Google&#039;s problem, it&#039;s ours. They gave us open source code to work with. It&#039;s been a week. There should be some stuff moving by now, but code monkey&#039;s don&#039;t really know how to use it yet. (No offense, I praise the monkey&#039;s.) Just give it some time and Google will have the same sort of Add-on basis that our beloved Firefox has, they&#039;ve already stated that in the cool comic they made. It&#039;s all about the future with Google, and I for one am thus impressed.

For now FF3 is still my primary browser, because it has everything that I use already incorporated, but Chrome has amazing potential. When Chrome One is finished I&#039;ll be switching it to my primary. There&#039;s nothing it wont have that I want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome has been amazing so far, I love everything about it, and yes some issues still exist.</p>
<p>IT&#8217;S STILL IN BETA FOR GOD SAKES&#8230;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve praised Google for a very long time now and their company just keeps pushing forward. I was however, reluctant to go Chrome, because I do love Firefox so very much.It&#8217;s been good to me where IE5-7 have just made me disgusted, IE needs to wake up and crawl out of the middle ages of the internet already, because what it&#8217;s done so far has just made me tuck tail and run. I&#8217;ve looked at the beta for IE8 and it looks nice and all, but I&#8217;d stick with FF2 if three hadn&#8217;t come out already.</p>
<p>Back to Google Chrome, the fact that there aren&#8217;t add ons or Skins for chrome so far isn&#8217;t Google&#8217;s problem, it&#8217;s ours. They gave us open source code to work with. It&#8217;s been a week. There should be some stuff moving by now, but code monkey&#8217;s don&#8217;t really know how to use it yet. (No offense, I praise the monkey&#8217;s.) Just give it some time and Google will have the same sort of Add-on basis that our beloved Firefox has, they&#8217;ve already stated that in the cool comic they made. It&#8217;s all about the future with Google, and I for one am thus impressed.</p>
<p>For now FF3 is still my primary browser, because it has everything that I use already incorporated, but Chrome has amazing potential. When Chrome One is finished I&#8217;ll be switching it to my primary. There&#8217;s nothing it wont have that I want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DevlinD</title>
		<link>http://experiencematters.criticalmass.com/2008/09/02/i-heart-google-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-1781</link>
		<dc:creator>DevlinD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experiencematters.criticalmass.com/?p=339#comment-1781</guid>
		<description>I also love the ability Chrome allows to resize text areas if they are too small, like the one I am writing this comment in. 

And as far as 1 process per tab, once you run into an issue with one page crashing and actually NOT crashing your whole browser this approach seems almost necessary. Plus it creates a lot less opportunity for memory leaks that are so prevalent with Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also love the ability Chrome allows to resize text areas if they are too small, like the one I am writing this comment in. </p>
<p>And as far as 1 process per tab, once you run into an issue with one page crashing and actually NOT crashing your whole browser this approach seems almost necessary. Plus it creates a lot less opportunity for memory leaks that are so prevalent with Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Sowrey</title>
		<link>http://experiencematters.criticalmass.com/2008/09/02/i-heart-google-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Sowrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experiencematters.criticalmass.com/?p=339#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>MJPG, I can verify your finding on Google Maps. Quite surprising, given the performance I saw in Flickr&#039;s map (built by Yahoo!), and that you&#039;d think a Google product would run better in a Google browser. 

I suspect once Google Maps is Gears-enabled (surprisingly, none of Google&#039;s sites seem to be that way yet), we&#039;ll likely see a significant boost in performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MJPG, I can verify your finding on Google Maps. Quite surprising, given the performance I saw in Flickr&#8217;s map (built by Yahoo!), and that you&#8217;d think a Google product would run better in a Google browser. </p>
<p>I suspect once Google Maps is Gears-enabled (surprisingly, none of Google&#8217;s sites seem to be that way yet), we&#8217;ll likely see a significant boost in performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJPG</title>
		<link>http://experiencematters.criticalmass.com/2008/09/02/i-heart-google-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-1771</link>
		<dc:creator>MJPG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experiencematters.criticalmass.com/?p=339#comment-1771</guid>
		<description>Try comparing Chrome (GC?) and IE7 dragging street maps in Google maps. Chrome is noticably slower on drag - with perhaps a 200px lag between cursor and map, compared with about 20px in IE. (This is under XP SP3 on a P4 2.6 with 1GB RAM.)

Otherwise, it&#039;s my favourite browser for other features (based on an hour of use), and Gmail in GC runs fater than IE.

It does seem however to be thrashing the disk for no reason I can see sometimes, and CPU use can go above 50% with it just sitting there in the background.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try comparing Chrome (GC?) and IE7 dragging street maps in Google maps. Chrome is noticably slower on drag &#8211; with perhaps a 200px lag between cursor and map, compared with about 20px in IE. (This is under XP SP3 on a P4 2.6 with 1GB RAM.)</p>
<p>Otherwise, it&#8217;s my favourite browser for other features (based on an hour of use), and Gmail in GC runs fater than IE.</p>
<p>It does seem however to be thrashing the disk for no reason I can see sometimes, and CPU use can go above 50% with it just sitting there in the background.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Chrome THAT Bad-ass? Probably, and probably not &#171; Patrick&#8217;s Blawg　パのブログ</title>
		<link>http://experiencematters.criticalmass.com/2008/09/02/i-heart-google-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-1770</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Chrome THAT Bad-ass? Probably, and probably not &#171; Patrick&#8217;s Blawg　パのブログ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experiencematters.criticalmass.com/?p=339#comment-1770</guid>
		<description>[...] by Patrick on 2 Sep 2008  Out on the wild, wild Interweb, there are people spouting praise upon praise upon praise for the promise of Google&#8217;s new web browser, Chrome, which made its debut [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Patrick on 2 Sep 2008  Out on the wild, wild Interweb, there are people spouting praise upon praise upon praise for the promise of Google&#8217;s new web browser, Chrome, which made its debut [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: media boy</title>
		<link>http://experiencematters.criticalmass.com/2008/09/02/i-heart-google-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-1769</link>
		<dc:creator>media boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experiencematters.criticalmass.com/?p=339#comment-1769</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m willing to try it out just to see if it works more efficiently than FireFox... if it&#039;s faster than Firefox, has tabs and isn&#039;t IE, then i&#039;ll use it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m willing to try it out just to see if it works more efficiently than FireFox&#8230; if it&#8217;s faster than Firefox, has tabs and isn&#8217;t IE, then i&#8217;ll use it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
