Unconventional Times Call for Unconventional Marketing

Originally published at Ad Age, Digital Next

As an individual, my blog is one of the most effective manifestations of “marketing” I could have produced for myself. I have a respectable audience that comes back as opposed to visiting it once, never to return again. People participate through comments and the content is distributable. But imagine if I started it the same way many large organizations launch conventional marketing initiatives. What would that have looked like?

If I were a corporate campaign

First I would have had to do several hundred pages of strategy documentation, including target audiences, marketing segments, competitive analysis – you name it. Then I would put some concepts together and test them in focus groups to see if representatives in a lab like A, B or C better. Next, I would take that feedback, make a few adjustments and plan a multichannel campaign, launching the blog with all sorts of advertising pointing to it. And since I painstakingly outlined the ROI in the in-depth strategy, I’d go about measuring the effectiveness against the ROI that was outlined prior to launch.

Of course, my blog, like millions of forms of “social media,” followed a path that looked nothing like that. In fact, it looked less linear and more cyclical. Sure, I put some initial thought into it before ever touching a pixel, but once I launched the blog it became a never-ending cycle of content development, template design tweaks and learning curves based off of what was going on each time I did something.

A learn-as-you-go process

For example, when I started posting visuals, I would check my stats and could see that people from all sorts of other sites and blogs began referencing them and linking back – so I realized the visuals were providing something people wanted and that if I wanted to continue to build an audience, this was a good way to do it. Secondly, I thought that my primary audience would be designers, when in fact the blog started attracting an eclectic audience of planners, marketers, librarians – even evangelists. After each cycle of launching content or functionality in the sidebars, I was learning about my audience and why they were coming. This required me to periodically have more frequent checkpoints of “little strategy” where I would plan the direction of where I wanted to go and make the appropriate adjustments to get there. And it felt less like a straight path and more like a meandering one, because the “focus group” was happening in real time after the initial launch.

I’ve been thinking about this for a while because after having some exposure to large organizations, it occurred to me that there is a desire to do more “unconventional marketing” but the machine that’s in place is actually “conventional” – all the things that have been done in the past. For example, it’s common and understandable for the “What’s the ROI?” question to be raised during an unconventional marketing initiative, but that question could derail the entire effort before it has a chance to ever get off the ground. Sometimes the ROI is simply insights and lessons that are gleaned from actually doing the initiative. Other times, the direction of the initiative changes midway through in unexpected ways that could not have been predicted. Many times for the better – let’s not forget that Twitter was never meant to be what it ended up being today.

Unconventional times call for unconventional paths

Speaking from personal experience, I could not have predicted many of the outcomes I have had since launching a blog, but I believe following a much more “unconventional” path is a core reason behind everything that I’ve learned from it. For a couple of hundred dollars a year and a whole lot of dedication and effort, it’s priceless to me. So as I think about how times are becoming more unconventional – with unpredictable financial markets and political change in the air – I can’t help but think that it’s more important than ever to get serious about what it takes to do these types of initiatives right. It just doesn’t look like conventional marketing – it’s different. And unconventional times call for unconventional tactics.


Last 5 posts by David Armano


7 Comments

  1. [...] As an individual, my blog is one of the most effective manifestations of “marketing” I could have produced for myself. I have a respectable audience that comes back as opposed to visiting it once, never to return again. … Read the rest of this great post here [...]

  2. Brilliant – this is what I have been trying o tell clients and others who think focus groups are useless, biased, or worse. I think they are one aspect of a many-parted conversation with people. Conventional marketing (which I learned in Brand Management at Proctor & Gamble Canada) is in fact the risky option now.

    I’ve launched my own little blog and just now am putting up video on plain and fancy thinking at reasonable rates. There’s lot’s to criticize about the videos. But there they are. The next ones will be much better. I’m following your strategy.

    Good work. I’ll subscribe.

  3. David Armano says:

    “There’s lot’s to criticize about the videos. But there they are.”

    That’s the spirit Tony. Go get em!

  4. Heidi Skinner says:

    David – I totally agree. This feels like Get Fuzzy 2.0! The key to influental marketing strategies is to allow for short timelines, and most importantly flexibility. Why? Because, we’re literally in the middle of a dialgue with a consumer, not pushing canned messaging to an “audience.”
    Brands need to think about conversational marketing in the context: When someone asks you for your number to contact you at a bar, do you immediately leave, then go home to craft a plan around when you might see them again and what you would say if you saw them? I hope not. Because, if that was the case, I wouldn’t be married. Social media interactions need to get closer to “real-life” interaction models. Get ready to get really fuzzy.

  5. David Armano says:

    Hey Heidi,

    Thanks for the comment here. Talk about fuzzy, who would have thought that one of the ways we would communicate would be on our company’s own public facing blog.

    The walls that separate internal from external are becoming thinner, or fuzzier. ;-)

  6. CoCreatr says:

    David, first time here, I feel floored by clarity. Started blogging in September and realize such a creative outlet is a touchstone for the mind, sharpening it as you go. Your blog is a fine example for Frank Feather’s quote:

    “The future belongs to those who get there first.”

  7. Gahlord says:

    What’s interesting to me is how similar both of the models are. At the end of the day they are the same thing: iterative processes or OODA loops.

    Just that your OODA involves smaller objectives and is lighter from an organizational standpoint. The tools and methodology that you use provide similar feedback as the tools of the big-launch OODA but on a quicker turnaround.

    This allows you to get through your OODA faster. Strategically rapid-multiple-small-objective-achievement defeating lengthy-singular-large-objective-achievement. Which is always teh w1n.

    Wow I dorked out on that one. Sorry. Great post.

    And to temper CoCreatr’s quote:

    The early bird gets the worm… but the second mouse gets the cheese.

Leave a Reply

[X]

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner