It’s Fivebux, But Do We Care?

Posted by Scott Shamberg / March 23, 2009 8:39 am 

 

Expensive CoffeeAt the annual investors meeting last week, coffee brat Howard Schultz, Starbucks CEO, went on the offensive regarding the perception that his coffee is expensive.

 

 

Howie (I feel like I can call him that since Howard is my middle name) made two key points. First, that Starbucks has “…become the poster child for excess…” Man, Ozzy Osbourne might have an argument with that if he could still form a sentence.

 

The second point he made was that because of the extraordinary taste of his coffee, it is a great value. “Don’t let anyone tell you their coffee is the same as Starbucks because it is not.” Oh, and by the way, they have plenty of coffee under $4.


Finally, Howie announced a forthcoming ad campaign that will convince people Starbucks is not as expensive as they are perceived. He said that recent campaigns have generated strong response. So here is my question – what exactly is a “strong response”?

 

I’m a believer that all campaigns should be driven by an insight, a consumer truth as one of my colleagues here likes to say (thanks for the line, Roger). So, yes, the fact that we are in a recession/depression/AIG induced spiral and people want to save money is an insight. But is it the right insight for Starbucks to act on?

My argument is that Starbucks and the whatever $ cup of coffee isn’t about the cost. It’s about the brand. People who drink it — drink it religiously and I don’t think it’s about the taste. Its about walking around with that logo on the cup. Maybe it says, “Hey, I can afford Starbucks.” Maybe it says, “I’m cool.” Maybe it says, “The coffee my office gives me tastes like mud water, the kind that Bear Grylls drinks.”

 

 

Is that a Grande or a Venti?

 

 

Look up Starbucks on Facebook. There are over 125,000 addicts (more than the amount of people Oprah launched with). You can send authentic Starbucks coffee to your friends. You can do the same with Dunkin Donuts, but the amount of people signed up is significantly less.

 

The point is that if you are going to launch a new campaign, especially in this environment, you better have the insight right. You better be sure that price IS the main driver to influence consumer behavior because if you are wrong, and you are Howie, you risk withdrawing from your brand bank in a way that you may not ever be able to deposit again. <Insert your own AIG reference here.>

 

  • Try harder please

    So what’s the insight? That it took you 400 words to conclude that Starbucks is really about “the brand”?

    Nice one, but do we care?

  • http://derekphillipsresume.blogspot.com/ Derek Phillips

    I think you’re right, Scott, but I think the insight they missed is that people are only willing to sacrifice so much and right now coffee ain’t one of them…or maybe that it SHOULDN’T be.

    Instead of trying to position Starbucks on price (“We’re not that expensive, really!”) they should consider the idea that while people are worried about their mortgages and their car payments and their jobs…they might actually like the one luxury they can still afford and that is a decent cup of Joe (not Scartz). The brand loyalists will certainly eat it up (imagine a campaign of t-shirts and FB badges that proclaim I Deserve This Starbucks!) and the casual shoppers might be convinced that they too deserve this one break a day.

  • http://januarylark.wordpress.com/ january

    I think that screaming “hey, we’re not *that* expensive” is only going to reinforce the idea that Starbucks is expensive in most people’s minds.
    Counterproductive.

  • http://www.ion.ie gary

    In Ireland coffee Starbucks Coffee is also expensive.
    Some local retailers are embracing the word on the street quicker than the big competitors.

    http://www.goodbuy.ie/items/287-the-99-cent-coffee-5-mins-from-grafton-street–also-tea-hot-chocolate

  • Michael

    Honestly, do any of you care about Starbucks operating costs? They probably make the same amount of income as Second cup or Tim Hortons (I live in Canadaville), just they have higher expenses to cover. People still buy mac, why would they stop buying Starbucks? You should tell your customers to cover additional overhead because you want to stay in business. Even if you’re markup is the same as other coffee shops, your overall price is still higher than the others, and that’s why it is expensive.

    Timmies vs Starbucks
    (L/XL = about a Tall/Grande)
    Flavored Cap = $1.85 @ Tim Hortons
    Flavored Cap = $4.59 @ Starbucks

    Maybe both of them make profit of $1.50, but that doesn’t change the price for consumers.

    It’s expensive, and delicious, and I treat myself ~ every 2-3 weeks.

  • Michael

    Sorry

    Shouldn’t** and your**

  • http://www.business.com beldenmaca

    indicate stories likewise instead indicates high

  • http://fahd.org Fahd

    Starbucks coffee costs more because they have/need a much larger marketing budget to maintain their brand. Don’t let anyone fool you otherwise!

  • http://us.lexusownersclub.com/forums/index.php?showuser=95341 John1508

    I bookmarked this guestbook. Thank you for good job!
    viagra , cialis , phentermine , buy tramadol , buy phentermine ,

blog comments powered by Disqus