Recently, Umair Haque’s presentation on Constructive Capitalism caught my attention.

Umair Haque @ Daytona Sessions vol. 2 – Constructive Capitalism from Daytona Sessions on Vimeo.

In short, this presentation discusses a shift in the economy from strategy to ideals, claiming that organizations can no longer be successful by trying to dominate markets or coerce people into buying products. He feels this is a result of an influx in richer and freer interactions among customers and between customers & organizations – this is no doubt a result of an increase in social media adoption through digital platforms.

With this economic shift, there is a change in its associated institutions, which act as the rules to interaction. The 20th Century institutions led to various crises that have encouraged this change:
nik blog pic
Looking at the 21st Century institutions, Umair believes this economic shift starts with meaning – focusing on creating positive outcomes rather than income – and by focusing on meaning, the other institutions will follow.

As a person passionate about branding, and who uses digital to leverage brands, I gravitated to this thinking because of its emphasis on creating interactions through ideals, which requires a combination of strong branding & engaging digital initiatives.

There are strong correlations between Umair’s Constructive Capitalism and branding. I believe all great brands have purpose – a core goal/idea that keeps the organization focused and consistent in its actions. This purpose is not about achieving high returns (income), rather it’s about making meaning – to change the world, right a wrong – essentially creating positive outcomes that are focused on ideals rather than strategy.

Google has an exemplary purpose to ‘organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible’. This audacious goal/ideal motivates the organization because they feel like they are contributing to something grander than a bottom line. This internal motivation and guiding purpose enables the organization to look beyond existing markets & innovate to find new ways to satisfy its purpose – focusing on equity rather than domination.

The key to successful branding is to live your brand purpose – be consistent in your actions and create reasons to believe in the brand.

What I love about digital is its ability to create reasons to believe – or what I like to call Digital Reasons to Believe (feel free to check out Digital Reasons to Believe for more details). Digital initiatives can create engaging experiences that provide services, support and, most importantly, a 2-way dialogue which bring the brand to life. It creates interactions, which are the foundation of this new economy.

Twitter, Facebook, forums, blogs, etc. make us freer to foster relationships with customers rather than focusing on transactions. This extends the lifetime value of our customers & generates positive brand recommendations. In addition, these digital interactions enable us to learn from our customers & discuss new ideas/products/etc., which results in users receiving more value in the end because they have been a part of the development process.

Digital platforms enable us to create meaningful interactions, which in turn helps organizations better satisfy their purpose to make meaning & create positive outcomes.

I’m excited & passionate to be a part of this new economy. I look forward to seeing more interactions and meaningful ideals!

  • http://www.attorneyservicesetc.com Postergal

    The present condition dictates what’s in and what’s out. Most people are just going with the flow to exist in these tough times.

  • http://ryangensel.blogspot.com Ryan Gensel

    I paralleled this concept in an article not 3 days before you posted this review.

    “Death, Taxes, and the Company Web Site – Is advertising a meme?”
    http://ryangensel.blogspot.com/2009/09/death-taxes-and-company-web-site-is.html

    I totally agree, but we also run the risk of becoming too intellectualized, ie. Structuralism versus Post-Structuralism. I fear we will repress our innovation to disregard concepts that have abstract meaning, and look to empty materialism and “false nouns” to fill the void.

    Business will inherently be linked to the evolution of language. We need to make knowledge accessible, not insulated from meaning. There are decisions that can not be decomposed into “true/false” / “on/off” / “0/1″, but we as language users will relate concepts as our own mind translates the symbiotic cultural conventions and re-write previously held tradition.

    I think we need to collaborate in small multi-disciplinary teams, set definite function requirements, and iteratively create “utterances” that flatten a concept in context of the current development cycle. Fix and Fail, Fix and Fail. Waste is a byproduct of innovation, but innovation applied can be leveraged to provide future value, not as a market insight to borrow against, but as an obvious evolution of a knowledge area. Quality will tell the story of human evolution. Quality of Life and Quality of Information are inextricable.

    The more organization and efficiency a workplace assumes, the more practices will be related to concepts of Communism and Fascism. They represent extreme ideologies. Culture is a balance, humanity is a balance, though is balance. It only takes a few pages of Nicholas Nassim Taleb to realize we are arrogant assumptuous animals through ignorance and cognitive dissonance will turn foreign concepts into pariah.

    Godwin’s law will precipitate Benford’s law of controversy and we will circuitously improve concepts by unconsciously popularizing then unpopularizing a subject. The subject remains benefited, but the poet is lost in translation.

    Can’t wait to read more of your posts.

    -Ryan Gensel

    twitter.com/readysetproject
    ryangensel.blogspot.com

blog comments powered by Disqus