Why Flickr Should Let the Haters Hate

Posted by Lindsay Renwick / August 12, 2010 12:00 pm 

Lindsay Renwick | Critical Mass TorontoImage credit: neilcreek.com

Flickr announced a new suite of features last week, including a larger photo display size, navigation upgrades and a slightly altered look and feel. In the immediate aftermath of the announcement, user reaction was  fairly predictable. Some jumped to the beta version weeks ago by clicking the jaunty “Take me to the future!” invitation and never looked back.  Some users avoided the change until the last minute and then seemed both shocked and upset once there was no turning back.

Looking at comments on message boards and on Twitter, it’s fair to say that this upgrade has been a success for Flickr, with encouraging comments outweighing the negativity. User experience experts worldwide must be applauding the fact that one of the world’s largest photo hosting sites has finally added a simple “< previous | next >” link adjacent to the image display, a feature that was conspicuously (and obnoxiously) absent from the previous version. The site is now considerably lighter too – according to CNET, Flickr will double upload speeds.

There are certainly some issues with the product: the navigation requires Javascript, RSS feed changes are making image embedding difficult, and the new map feature has raised genuine security concerns.

Still, after the months of work and despite weeks of user consultation and careful audience preparation it must sting for Flickr’s developers to read messages like these:

“utterly hating the new flickr layout. utt. ter. lee.”

“Crap, @flickr have gone and implemented the new RUBBISH photo page, despite all the protests. #fail”

The fundamental truth is that we are all creatures of habit. Some people have the habit of jumping on each new change as it arises, and some people simply can’t stand it when systems they’ve grown accustomed to get redirected or changed. The only thing that’s new here is the fact that the very social web that powers Flickr’s popularity also provides the second type of person with access to an immediate channel for their frustration. In the coming weeks, the negative commentary will likely die down as users adjust to a new series of clicks. Should the complaints continue and increase in frequency, Flickr may want to collect data on the most prominent problems and adapt accordingly.

The lesson for marketers is that any new announcement heralding a change in your customers’ expectations will always be accompanied by a shower of criticism from social channels. The trick is not to give it more attention than it deserves. Given the balance between critical commentary and positive, for Flickr to step in and earnestly apologize or offer incentives to smooth ruffled feathers would only amplify the negative message and undermine the real advances it has achieved.

It can be very difficult for businesses to show restraint in situations like these, because it goes against decades of received wisdom. Keeping mum in the face of public displeasure feels like a violation of some of the main tenets of the PR playbook and potentially like ignoring an opportunity to turn a customer service problem into a good news story. Those are still valid concerns — when the level of conversation warrants it and when customers are complaining about a specific service failure or violation of trust. But with the unavoidable, vague negativity that accompanies new developments, you’re wisest to treat the messages like smoke signals. Keep them on your horizon, but unless they turn into fire, you’re better off leaving them be.

Lindsay is an Influence Marketing Manager in the Toronto office.

  • John McArdle

    One of the main things that the redesign did wrong is add additional clicks to existing task flows, and remove the ability to click out of an overlay to dismiss it. Pretty large changes, and both changes generally go against better, established ways of doing things.

    They also make up the majority of users social activity on the web; tasks like adding pictures to groups are much more time consuming than they used to be, and are core activities required to get new people to look at your photos.

    While I agree that the internet is full of people who often complain for no good reason, we shouldn’t be so quick to dismiss user problems. We are, after all, in the customer service business in a lot of ways.

    Let’s also not forget that many flickr users are paying for the service, and as such feel that they have the right to complain. Having these complaints fall on deaf ears can be frustrating, and flickr has a history of being dragged kicking and screaming into changes (like your afore mentioned navigational issue).

    IMO, it’s better to engage in a dialog and admit “mistakes” (look at Blizzard’s recent relaunch of their Battle.net service to see the Flickr furor in a form that’s exponentially bigger), than to dismiss all feedback to a redesign as shower of criticism from social channels.

  • http://topsy.com/experiencematters.criticalmass.com/2010/08/12/why-flickr-should-let-the-haters-hate/?utm_source=pingback&utm_campaign=L2 Tweets that mention experience matters » Blog Archive » Why Flickr Should Let the Haters Hate — Topsy.com

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Critical Mass and Chris Sandoval, Lindsay Renwick. Lindsay Renwick said: I wrote this one! (humbly, obvs) RT @criticalmass: Why Flickr Should Let the Haters Hate http://goo.gl/fb/Ue2dj [...]

  • Lindsay Renwick

    @John_McArdle The spark for this article was that I was seeing a real split among the comments – for every one person who hates it, there seem to be two (or more) people who really love it.

    One of the things we tend to advise our clients about is the need to build in some “cooling off” time before reacting to hostility in social environments. When the defense of the brand comes from another community member, it tends to carry a lot more weight than if the brand reacts with panicky defensiveness.

    You’re spot on about using the feedback to improve service, and I hope they do. That’s the best way to win the PR war. Looking at the comments a week later, I can see a trickling off effect happening as people adjust, which is why I still think that a flurry of apologies right off the bat would have been the wrong way to go.

    You may be seeing something different, though. I appreciate the feedback.

  • http://www.howtomakeawebsite.net Daniel

    I Agree with John above. Yahoo! is famous for re-designing and making navigation and usability worsen.

    The did the same thing in Yahoo! mail a while ago.

blog comments powered by Disqus