Last month Richard Branson released the iPad only magazine Project. As one of the first in its class it has the potential to set the standards for magazine based interaction on the iPad. Although Wired, Popular Science, Oprah and many others have released iPad versions of their magazines. Project is the first iPad only magazine.

Project has a really informative ‘how to use’ screen, however, there are a lot of different interactive elements and it still runs the risk of being overlooked as it comes off a little too complex.

After sharing with a few friends, I noticed they were having some issues with the interactions. There are sections on the page that contain numbered screens which hold different content when the numbers are selected, and without reading the how to, I can see a lot people missing this really unique area. I also found that some of the galleries are not labeled as galleries, so it does take some exploring to get a feel for the magazines standards.

Once you get used to the interactions however, the magazine is quite amazing. You can fly through it easily and the interactive nature of the content is engaging and informative. This is the new way of viewing magazines. I’m confident that the interaction issues will be ironed out in future issues, and this is one iPad magazine I can’t wait for every month.

As the iPad is still a new medium, it is interesting to see the variety of interaction standards between apps and magazines and it will be fun to keep an eye on which ones  develop the standard for interaction.

Darren is an Information Architect in our Calgary office.

  • Chrissie

    Thanks for the post. Love the look.
    Would love to start seeing some usability results.
    The material looks really slick. The early adopter set will probably love this.
    A shame to miss features because of usability though. But I guess there are new paradigms being defined here.

  • Darren Wood

    Nice Article.

    Project is another step in the right direction for iPad publications.

    My favourite piece of the app is what they call the “Spine” and is the strongest move they’ve made into digital instead of just making a magazine on the iPad. The “Spine” is a backdoor into the forum/discussion area for each article. You can hit and see what the real time thoughts are around an article – it starts blurring that line into digital.

    Project was thoroughly disappointing for me once I got past the cover… Yes it’s a nifty one, and has some interesting interactions past that, but I want more. The idea of the magazine needs further decomposition into digital. It’s getting there, and many of the different concepts appearing in varying apps mean a step further.

    This conversation is two sided. While magazines are working to be more digital – digital is working towards being more editorial and curated. Flipboard, for example. It’s going to be where these two areas intersect that will be the winner in my book.

    It’s getting there.

  • Darren Northcott

    Yeah Wood, totally agree. the Spine was an ingenious addition by Project, but i fear it won’t be used to it’s full potential. I feel like they should have integrated it a little more into the articled themselves, calling out sections that have been commented on, ect. I too was disappointed in the content, but i have a feeling that will change in future issues (hopefully) and was merely attributed to getting the product out the door to beat ‘The Daily’

blog comments powered by Disqus